🔗 Share this article

When I am a game master, I historically shied away from heavy use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying sessions. My preference was for the plot and session development to be determined by character actions instead of the roll of a die. However, I decided to alter my method, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Observing an Improvised Tool

A well-known streamed game showcases a DM who frequently requests "luck rolls" from the adventurers. This involves selecting a specific dice and outlining potential outcomes contingent on the roll. While it's fundamentally no unlike rolling on a random table, these are devised in the moment when a player's action doesn't have a clear conclusion.

I opted to test this technique at my own game, primarily because it looked engaging and presented a change from my usual habits. The experience were remarkable, prompting me to reflect on the perennial dynamic between pre-determination and spontaneity in a tabletop session.

A Powerful Story Beat

In a recent session, my players had concluded a large-scale battle. Later, a player wondered if two beloved NPCs—a brother and sister—had survived. Instead of picking a fate, I asked for a roll. I asked the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both died; on a 5-9, a single one succumbed; a high roll, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a deeply poignant sequence where the characters came upon the corpses of their companions, forever united in death. The group conducted funeral rites, which was especially significant due to previous story developments. In a concluding gesture, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were suddenly transformed, containing a enchanted item. I randomized, the item's contained spell was precisely what the group lacked to address another pressing story problem. One just plan these kinds of magical story beats.

Improving Your Improvisation

This incident caused me to question if randomization and spontaneity are in fact the beating heart of tabletop RPGs. Although you are a meticulously planning DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Adventurers often find joy in ignoring the most carefully laid plots. Therefore, a skilled DM has to be able to think quickly and invent content in real-time.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to train these skills without going completely outside your usual style. The key is to use them for small-scale situations that don't fundamentally change the campaign's main plot. For instance, I wouldn't use it to decide if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. But, I could use it to decide if the characters enter a room moments before a major incident occurs.

Empowering Player Agency

Spontaneous randomization also works to make players feel invested and create the feeling that the story is dynamic, evolving based on their actions in real-time. It prevents the perception that they are merely actors in a rigidly planned narrative, thereby enhancing the cooperative nature of roleplaying.

This approach has always been part of the game's DNA. Original D&D were filled with random tables, which suited a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. Even though contemporary D&D often prioritizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, this isn't always the best approach.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

It is perfectly no problem with being prepared. But, equally valid no problem with letting go and letting the rolls to determine certain outcomes in place of you. Authority is a major part of a DM's role. We need it to run the game, yet we often struggle to give some up, in situations where doing so could be beneficial.

My final suggestion is this: Have no fear of letting go of your plan. Experiment with a little randomness for inconsequential story elements. It may discover that the organic story beat is significantly more rewarding than anything you might have scripted in advance.